From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Powell v. Massachusetts

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Dec 6, 2016
Civil Action No. 16-30004-MGM (D. Mass. Dec. 6, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 16-30004-MGM

12-06-2016

WALTER J. POWELL, Plaintiff, v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS
(Dkt. Nos. 17, 31, 64, 66, 74, and 85)

Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson has recommended the court grant the separate motions of the defendants P. Keyburn Hollister (Dkt. No. 17); Anthony Patella (Dkt. No. 31); Kenneth W. Luke and Francis B. Marinaro (Dkt. No. 64); Lisa M. McCormack, Clement A. Ferris, and Howard W. Neff, III (Dkt. No. 66); and Timothy J. Shugrue (Dkt. No. 74) to dismiss all five counts of pro se Plaintiff Walter J. Powell's operative complaint (Dkt. No. 50). The Report and Recommendation notified the parties that, if they had an objection, it would have to be filed within fourteen days. No objection has been filed.

Based upon the thorough analysis presented in the Report and Recommendation, and noting there are no objections, the court, upon de novo review, hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. (Dkt. No. 85.) Based upon this, Defendants' motions to dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 17, 31, 64, 66, and 74) are hereby GRANTED.

It is So Ordered.

/s/ Mark G. Mastroianni

MARK G. MASTROIANNI

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Powell v. Massachusetts

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Dec 6, 2016
Civil Action No. 16-30004-MGM (D. Mass. Dec. 6, 2016)
Case details for

Powell v. Massachusetts

Case Details

Full title:WALTER J. POWELL, Plaintiff, v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Date published: Dec 6, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 16-30004-MGM (D. Mass. Dec. 6, 2016)

Citing Cases

Pironti v. Sprague

That includes "judicial employees, including court clerks, where they have performed. . . tasks (that are…

Lath v. Oak Brook Condo. Owners' Ass'n

In its show cause order, the court explained that "a § 1985(2) 'plaintiff may recover only when the…