From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

POUY v. MANDIA

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1931
234 App. Div. 897 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

December, 1931.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ. Settle order on notice.


Judgment in so far as appealed from modified so as to extend the injunctive relief accorded herein to the bona fide tenants and guests of the owners of any portions of parcel A, and by eliminating the provision excluding tenants, lessees or licensees of said owners, and as so modified unanimously affirmed, without costs. The easement herein is appurtenant to the land and its beneficial enjoyment accrues not only to the owners of portions of parcel A but to bona fide tenants and guests of such owners. The regulations prescribed by the defendants to enable them to identify those who are rightfully entitled to enjoy the easement are reasonable and proper. Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings and conclusions should be made in accordance herewith.


Summaries of

POUY v. MANDIA

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1931
234 App. Div. 897 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

POUY v. MANDIA

Case Details

Full title:MARIE POUY and Others, Appellants, Respondents, v. MARIA MANDIA and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1931

Citations

234 App. Div. 897 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Citing Cases

Menucha of Nyack v. Fisher

plaintiff's motion which was for summary judgment on so much of its first cause of action as sought a…

H.H. Apartments, Inc. v. Beachcliff Realty

The use of the term "appurtenances" in the conveyances of the parcels did not serve to create an easement (…