From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Potter v. Lewin

Supreme Court of California
Dec 23, 1898
123 Cal. 146 (Cal. 1898)

Opinion

         Department One

         APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County and from an order denying a new trial. E. P. Unangst, Judge.

         COUNSEL:

         F. A. Dorn, for Appellant.

         Graves & Graves, and Louis Lamy, for Respondent.


         OPINION

         THE COURT

         Plaintiff brought this action to recover the value of material and services furnished in the matter of the burial of one Hughes. He presented a claim for the amount to the administrator, which claim was allowed in part. Thereafter he brought this action against the administrator of the estate for the entire amount.

         It is first insisted that the action was not brought within three months after the claim was rejected, and that therefore it is barred. Sufficient answer to this contention is found in the fact that a claim for funeral expenses is not one of those claims which the statute requires to be presented to the administrator for his approval. Hence the presentation to the administrator in this case was useless labor and accomplished nothing. Under the evidence there is neither an accord and satisfaction nor an account stated. We find no merit in the appeal.

         Judgment and order affirmed.


Summaries of

Potter v. Lewin

Supreme Court of California
Dec 23, 1898
123 Cal. 146 (Cal. 1898)
Case details for

Potter v. Lewin

Case Details

Full title:H. C. POTTER, Respondent, v. M. LEWIN, Administrator, etc., Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Dec 23, 1898

Citations

123 Cal. 146 (Cal. 1898)
55 P. 783

Citing Cases

Golden Gate Undertaking Company v. Taylor

It is not a debt arising upon a contract made by the decedent in his lifetime, and a creditor's claim, as…

Donegan v. Houston

The issue as to whether or not there was a waiver of the engineer's certificate was properly tried by the…