relying in part on inference against discrimination where person who participated in the allegedly adverse decision is also a member of the same protected class
Summary of this case from Ragin v. East Ramapo Central School DistrictNo. 93-9035.
March 15, 1994.
S.D.N.Y., 835 F.Supp. 120.
AFFIRMED
relying in part on inference against discrimination where person who participated in the allegedly adverse decision is also a member of the same protected class
Summary of this case from Ragin v. East Ramapo Central School Districtrelying in part on inference against discrimination where person who participated in the allegedly adverse decision is also a member of the same protected class
Summary of this case from EDER v. CITY OF NEW YORKpointing out that because some of the decision makers were members of the same protected age group as plaintiff, plaintiff's ability to raise an inference of age discrimination was hampered
Summary of this case from Dewitt v. Mecklenburg CountyFull title:Posr v. City of New York
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Date published: Mar 15, 1994
legal fees Towers paid to Squadron Ellenoff. See, e.g., A to Z Assoc. v. Cooper, 161 Misc.2d 283, 292-93,…
Wasserman v. Maimonides Medical CenterBecause the allegations fail to state a substantive RICO claim, and the conspiracy claim is based on the same…