From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PORTNOW v. LA ROSA

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jan 14, 1948
190 Misc. 695 (N.Y. App. Term 1948)

Opinion

January 14, 1948.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn.

Moses Block for appellant.

Anthony W. Fiero for respondents.


MEMORANDUM Per Curiam.

The petition is defective inasmuch as it describes the petitioner as the owner in fee of the premises when admittedly he is a co-owner. Section 1415 of the Civil Practice Act requires that he and his co-owner should join in the petition and state their interests in the premises. ( Lucchesi v. Johnson, N YL.J., Dec. 14, 1946, p. 1749, col. 6.)

The final order should be unanimously modified on the law by inserting a provision that the dismissal of the proceeding was without prejudice, and, as so modified, the final order should be affirmed, without costs.

MacCRATE, STEINBRINK and FENNELLY, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

PORTNOW v. LA ROSA

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jan 14, 1948
190 Misc. 695 (N.Y. App. Term 1948)
Case details for

PORTNOW v. LA ROSA

Case Details

Full title:HYMAN PORTNOW, Landlord, Appellant, v. "FRANK" LA ROSA et al., Tenants…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Jan 14, 1948

Citations

190 Misc. 695 (N.Y. App. Term 1948)
78 N.Y.S.2d 583

Citing Cases

Pugliese v. Saburro

The petitioner, an owner of an undivided interest in the premises, could not alone, without having his…

Pugliese v. Saburro

The petitioner, an owner of an undivided interest in the premises, could not alone, without having his…