From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Portland General Electric Co. v. Raver

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Apr 29, 1946
97 F. Supp. 892 (D. Or. 1946)

Opinion

Civ. 1914. No. 1013.

April 29, 1946.

Clarence D. Phillips, Portland, Or., for debtor.

Ralph H. King, Portland, Or., for independent trustees of debtor.

Frederick M. DeNeffe, Paul E. Kern, Portland Or., for Bondholders Committee.

W. Stevens Tucker, San Francisco, Cal., for Securities Exchange Commission.

Charles A. Hart, Portland, Or., Edgar G. Crossman and Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Sunderland Kiendl, New York City, for Guaranty Trust Co.

Justin N. Reinhardt, Portland, Or., for First Preferred Stockholders.

MacCormac Snow, Harry Beckett, Robert T. Mautz and V. Lyle McCroskey, Portland, Or., for Prior Preference Stockholders.


In this case, two issues of a jurisdictional nature are placed for determination by the Court by the preliminary pretrial order drafted under the supervision of the Court. There are two main issues:

1. It is contended that this action should be dismissed because the Secretary of the Interior is an indispensable party and has not been joined.

The Court finds that the Secretary of the Interior is not an indispensable party to the maintenance of this action.

2. It is contended that the complaint should be dismissed because this is a suit against the United States.

The Court finds that the action is one against an official of the United States Government and is not in any respect an action against the United States nor does it require a judgment declaratory against the United States.

It should be noted that jurisdictional issues are always present with a court until final determination. This Court cannot now and therefore does not attempt finally to dispose of the two jurisdictional issues above noted.


Summaries of

Portland General Electric Co. v. Raver

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Apr 29, 1946
97 F. Supp. 892 (D. Or. 1946)
Case details for

Portland General Electric Co. v. Raver

Case Details

Full title:PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. v. RAVER

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Apr 29, 1946

Citations

97 F. Supp. 892 (D. Or. 1946)

Citing Cases

In re Portland Electric Power Co.

The independent trustees and their attorney valiantly opposed this attempt and engaged in litigation, which…

Delzell v. Raver

Therefore, Rule 23(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, does not apply. 4. It is then contended that the…