From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Porterfield v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 29, 1991
175 A.D.2d 787 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

August 29, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.).


Plaintiff Ilah, an assistant principal at Theodore Roosevelt High School in Bronx County, brought this action against defendants to recover damages for injuries sustained when she was sexually assaulted in an unlocked book room by an unknown armed assailant.

Contrary to plaintiff's contentions, the allegations in the complaint, as amplified in the bill of particulars and testimony before trial, do not arise from defendants' failure to fulfill their proprietary duties but rather arise from defendants' exercise of their governmental function (see, Bonner v City of New York, 73 N.Y.2d 930). Since the IAS Court had previously determined in an order dated October 28, 1987, that plaintiffs had failed to make out a claim for breach of special duty by defendants in a governmental capacity, the dismissal of the remaining claims in the complaint was appropriate.

We have considered plaintiff's other contentions and find them to be without merit. (See, McIvor v Di Benedetto, 121 A.D.2d 519, 522; Freeze Right Refrig. Air Conditioning Servs. v City of New York, 101 A.D.2d 175, 180.)

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Ross and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Porterfield v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 29, 1991
175 A.D.2d 787 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Porterfield v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:ILAH PORTERFIELD et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Aug 29, 1991

Citations

175 A.D.2d 787 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
573 N.Y.S.2d 681

Citing Cases

Porterfield v. City of New York

Decided January 9, 1992 Appeal from (1st Dept: 175 A.D.2d 787) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL GRANTED OR…

Lasker v. City of New York

We affirm. It is well settled that the "provision of security against physical attacks by third parties * * *…