From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pope v. Mayo

Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division A
Mar 11, 1949
39 So. 2d 286 (Fla. 1949)

Opinion

March 11, 1949.

Earl Pope, in pro. per.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen. and Reeves Bowen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.


Habeas corpus proceeding by Earl Pope against Nathan Mayo, custodian of Florida State Prison and Florida State Road Department.

Petition denied.


Petitioner was tried and convicted on an information charging the larceny of a bull. He was sentenced to serve four years at hard labor in the State Penitentiary. He now seeks relief from that judgment by habeas corpus on the theory that he was denied the benefit of counsel at his trial. He relies on Wade v. Mayo, 334 U.S. 672, 68 S.Ct. 1270, 92 L.Ed. ___.

The record shows that petitioner had previously applied for and was granted a writ of habeas corpus by the Circuit Court of Manatee County, that an answer was filed and much evidence was taken on the issues made by the answer to the writ. On consideration the writ was discharged and the petitioner was remanded. An appeal from the order of remand was taken to this Court where the question was raised and thoroughly considered and the judgment of the Circuit Court was affirmed July 30, 1948.

It follows that the point raised has been previously litigated and adjudicated against the petitioner. We find no merit to his contention so the petition is denied.

It is so ordered.

ADAMS, C.J., and CHAPMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pope v. Mayo

Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division A
Mar 11, 1949
39 So. 2d 286 (Fla. 1949)
Case details for

Pope v. Mayo

Case Details

Full title:POPE v. MAYO

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division A

Date published: Mar 11, 1949

Citations

39 So. 2d 286 (Fla. 1949)

Citing Cases

Durley v. Mayo

See Florida ex rel. Davis v. Hardie, 108 Fla. 133, 146 So. 97. On the other hand, it has, at times, treated…

Moat v. Mayo

The rule in this State is that denial of application for habeas corpus precludes a subsequent application for…