From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pope v. Candelaria

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 15, 2005
CV F 99-5445 DLB HC, [Doc. 69] (E.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2005)

Opinion

CV F 99-5445 DLB HC, [Doc. 69].

August 15, 2005


ORDER REGARDING PETITIONER'S NOTICE TO COURT TO APPOINT COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER


On December 22, 2003, the Ninth Circuit vacated the order denying Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus and remanded the matter back to this court to conduct an evidentiary hearing. On May 27, 2004, the Court conducted an evidentiary hearing regarding the issues raised by the Ninth Circuit. On January 21, 2005, the Court issued an order denying the petition and judgment was entered that same day.

On July 20, 2005, Petitioner filed a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Respondent filed an opposition on August 2, 2005.

On July 29, 2005, Petitioner filed a notice to the Court regarding appointment of separate counsel for Petitioner. Petitioner's counsel, Carolyn Wiggin, indicates that Petitioner has recently submitted a pro se pleading to the Ninth Circuit complaining of the Office of the Federal Defender's conduct in this case. Counsel reasons that if the Court deems it appropriate, outside counsel could be appointed for Petitioner either to take over the entire case or to appear at the August 19, 2005, hearing to argue the third point in the motion for relief from judgment, that counsel was ineffective.

Petitioner's request is premature at this juncture. Depending on the outcome of Petitioner's motion for relief from judgment, the Court cannot, at this time, determine whether outside counsel is necessary. Thus, the request is denied, without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pope v. Candelaria

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 15, 2005
CV F 99-5445 DLB HC, [Doc. 69] (E.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2005)
Case details for

Pope v. Candelaria

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE POPE, Petitioner, v. RANDOLPH CANDELARIA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 15, 2005

Citations

CV F 99-5445 DLB HC, [Doc. 69] (E.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2005)

Citing Cases

Davenport v. Witt

Motley Motley, of Gadsden, for appellee. Where partnership has been dissolved, and a balance struck and…

National Surety Co. v. Citizens' Light, Heat

It will be noted that said agreements were in evidence, having been introduced without objection as a part of…