From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Poole v. Watts

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One
Jun 18, 2007
139 Wn. App. 1018 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007)

Summary

stating that the fact that the foreclosure sale purchaser purchased the property for a “low price” did not in itself put the purchaser on notice that anything was amiss with the sale

Summary of this case from Shadow Wood Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. N.Y. Cmty. Bancorp, Inc.

Opinion

No. 58003-5-I.

June 18, 2007.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 05-2-06115-2, Ronald L. Castleberry, J., entered March 20, 2006.


Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Appelwick, C.J., concurred in by Grosse and Cox, JJ.


Summaries of

Poole v. Watts

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One
Jun 18, 2007
139 Wn. App. 1018 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007)

stating that the fact that the foreclosure sale purchaser purchased the property for a “low price” did not in itself put the purchaser on notice that anything was amiss with the sale

Summary of this case from Shadow Wood Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. N.Y. Cmty. Bancorp, Inc.
Case details for

Poole v. Watts

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY POOLE ET AL., Petitioners, v. DARREN WATTS ET AL., Respondents

Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One

Date published: Jun 18, 2007

Citations

139 Wn. App. 1018 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007)
139 Wash. App. 1018

Citing Cases

Shadow Wood Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. N.Y. Cmty. Bancorp, Inc.

bona fide under common-law principles if it takes the property “for a valuable consideration and without…