From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Poole v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 21, 1996
674 So. 2d 746 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 94-2731.

January 24, 1996. Rehearing, Rehearing En Banc, and Certification of Conflict Denied; Certification of Question Granted June 21, 1996.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, for Broward County; Mark A. Speiser, Judge.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Allen J. DeWeese, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Myra J. Fried, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


This case fits squarely within our holding in Jones v. State, 656 So.2d 489 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), which controls the outcome here. In Jones, as here, the trial court gave extemporaneous instructions to the jury that denigrate the reasonable doubt standard. We held in Jones that it was fundamental error to instruct a jury that it could convict on a lesser standard of proof. Accordingly, as we did in Jones, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

POLEN, KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Poole v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 21, 1996
674 So. 2d 746 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Poole v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES MICHAEL POOLE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 21, 1996

Citations

674 So. 2d 746 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

State v. Poole

SHAW, J. We have for review Poole v. State, 674 So.2d 746 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), wherein the district court…

Pierce v. State

Initially, we reverse and remand for a new trial due to fundamental error created when the trial court…