From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Poole v. Bagwell

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Apr 11, 1922
119 S.C. 23 (S.C. 1922)

Opinion

10854

April 11, 1922.

Original proceeding by W.D. Poole and others, Trustees of Zion School District, in certiorari to review the action of the State Board of Education in reversing a decision of a County Board of Education on the appeal of Charles Bagwell and others, taxpayers, locating a schoolhouse. Decision of State Board reversed.

Messrs Boyd Brown, for petitioners, cite: Certiorari proper proceeding: 86 S.C. 541. State Board is appellate tribunal and can consider only issues of law: 1 Civ. Code 1912, Secs. 1707, 1736. Province of District Board to locate school: 1 Civ. Code 1912, Sec. 1761. Discretion of local board cannot be delegated or usurped: 103 S.C. 531. Messrs. Evans Galbraith, for respondents, cite: County Boards of Education under supervision of the State Board: 52 S.C. 204. Decision of State Board has conclusive quality of a judgment: 31 A.R.L., 169. Discretion must be exercised reasonably and in good faith: 103 S.E., 536. Decision of State Board final: 114 S.C. 169.


April 11, 1922. The opinion of the Court was delivered by


Certiorari proceedings in the original jurisdiction of this Court to review the action of the State Board of Education on an appeal by the respondents herein from the action of the County Board of Education in reference to the location of a schoolhouse in Zion School District.

The local trustees unanimously selected a certain location: the opponents appealed to the County Board of Education; this board confirmed the action of the trustees; the opponents then appealed to the State Board. The latter acted, not upon the record for appeal, but sent one of their members upon a tour of personal investigation. He made a report favoring the location insisted upon by the opponents of the location selected by the trustees and approved by the County Board. The State Board, evidently acting upon this report and an ex parte statement of a distinguished educator of that county, reversed the action of the County Board of Education.

The State Board of Education is an appellate tribunal in such matters and is limited to the questions raised as they appear in the record for appeal. Sections 1707, 1736, Vol. 1, Code of Laws, A.D. 1912. They were without power to make an independent investigation of their own. Sarratt v. Cash, 103 S.C. 531; 88 S.E., 256. Upon the record before them the action of the County Board should have been sustained.

The judgment of this Court is that the action of the State Board of Education under review be reversed, and that of the County Board of Education be sustained.


Summaries of

Poole v. Bagwell

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Apr 11, 1922
119 S.C. 23 (S.C. 1922)
Case details for

Poole v. Bagwell

Case Details

Full title:POOLE ET AL. v. BAGWELL ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Apr 11, 1922

Citations

119 S.C. 23 (S.C. 1922)
111 S.E. 788

Citing Cases

Watson v. Spartanburg County Board

Mr. R.B. Paslay, for appellants, cites: Distinction betweenqualified voters and qualified electors: 120 S.C.…

Ex Parte Miller

S.C. 1; 171 S.C. 210. Constitutionality of Act for bank control: 88 S.C. 438; 70 S.E., 1055; 81 S.C. 244; 62…