From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ponce v. Miao Ling Liu

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 10, 2014
123 A.D.3d 787 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-12-10

Juan PONCE, et al., respondents, v. MIAO LING LIU, appellant. (and a third-party action).

The McCauley Law Firm, LLP, New York, N.Y. (David F. Tavella of counsel), for appellant. Silberstein, Awad & Miklos, P.C., Garden City, N.Y. (Daniel P. Miklos of counsel), for respondents.


The McCauley Law Firm, LLP, New York, N.Y. (David F. Tavella of counsel), for appellant. Silberstein, Awad & Miklos, P.C., Garden City, N.Y. (Daniel P. Miklos of counsel), for respondents.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McDonald, J.), dated December 23, 2013, which denied her motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 to strike the complaint, or, in the alternative, to vacate the note of issue and compel the plaintiffs to appear for a further deposition by a date certain.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 to strike the complaint, or, in the alternative, to vacate the note of issue and compel the plaintiffs to appear for a further deposition by a date certain. The defendant failed to provide an affirmation of a good-faith effort to resolve the discovery dispute, as required by 22 NYCRR 202.7 ( see Murphy v. County of Suffolk, 115 A.D.3d 820, 982 N.Y.S.2d 380; Quiroz v. Beitia, 68 A.D.3d 957, 960, 893 N.Y.S.2d 70; Walter B. Melvin, Architects, LLC v. 24 Aqueduct Lane Condominium, 51 A.D.3d 784, 785, 857 N.Y.S.2d 697). LEVENTHAL, J.P., HALL, AUSTIN and ROMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ponce v. Miao Ling Liu

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 10, 2014
123 A.D.3d 787 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Ponce v. Miao Ling Liu

Case Details

Full title:Juan PONCE, et al., respondents, v. MIAO LING LIU, appellant. (and a…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 10, 2014

Citations

123 A.D.3d 787 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
123 A.D.3d 787
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 8618

Citing Cases

HSBC Bank U.S. v. Serafin

The branch of the Serafin defendants' motion for an order, ostensibly, pursuant to CPLR 3124 compelling the…

Wells Fargo Bank v. Del Carpio

To the extent that the defendant mortgagor moves, ostensibly, pursuant to CPLR 3124 for an order compelling…