From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pomerantz v. Naomi Realty Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Opinion

March, 1930.


Order denying motion to vacate or modify notice of examination before trial reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted to the extent of eliminating the 20th item of the notice. Examination to proceed on five day's notice at place and hour stated in the order. The item in question requires an examination as to the amount of money collected as rent by appellant, Kurtz, and the disbursements therefrom. Such an examination would involve an accounting, which should not be allowed. ( De Rapalie v. Gavin, 209 App. Div. 883; Slaughter v. Turkel, 146 id. 620.) Lazansky, P.J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pomerantz v. Naomi Realty Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Case details for

Pomerantz v. Naomi Realty Corporation

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS POMERANTZ, Suing on Behalf of Himself and All Other Stockholders of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1930

Citations

228 App. Div. 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Citing Cases

Nishman v. De Marco

Thus, any other issue — including that of clean hands — was necessarily excluded. In an accounting action,…

Moffat v. Phoenix Brewery Corporation

That is the first issue to be determined, and until that is decided in plaintiffs' favor it cannot be said…