From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

POLK ARMS, INC., v. KOHLER

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jul 18, 1932
144 Misc. 326 (N.Y. App. Term 1932)

Opinion

July 18, 1932.

Appeal from the Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Ninth District.

Dunnington, Gregg Church [ John J. O'Brien of counsel], for the appellant.

McLaughlin Stern [ P.J. Starkman of counsel], for the respondent.


The record indicates that the trial court found as matter of law that the noises emanating from the apartment overhead could not support the tenant's claim of constructive eviction. ( Seaboard Realty Co. v. Fuller, 33 Misc. 109.) In view of the pertinent provisions of the lease, including that which empowered the landlord to terminate conduct disturbing to the other occupants of the building, and the proof that here the landlord took no effective steps to remedy conditions after ample notice, we think sufficient facts were presented to require the court to pass on the merits of the defense. ( Levine Rosen v. Hence, App. Term, Oct. 1931.)

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, LEVY, CALLAHAN and UNTERMYER, JJ.


Summaries of

POLK ARMS, INC., v. KOHLER

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jul 18, 1932
144 Misc. 326 (N.Y. App. Term 1932)
Case details for

POLK ARMS, INC., v. KOHLER

Case Details

Full title:POLK ARMS, INC., Respondent, v. J. RICHARD KOHLER, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jul 18, 1932

Citations

144 Misc. 326 (N.Y. App. Term 1932)
258 N.Y.S. 809

Citing Cases

Rockrose Assoc. v. Peters

Courts have previously found noise, under less compelling circumstances, caused by the act or omission of the…

Finkelstein v. Levinson

Of even greater importance, and fatal to the tenant's case, the condition complained of (noise) was not…