From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Polisar v. Linz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 1972
39 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Opinion

April 3, 1972


In an action to recover damages for alleged defamation, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated August 4, 1971, which granted defendant's motion for a protective order under CPLR 3103 (subd. [a]) vacating plaintiff's notice to take the depositions of certain nonparty witnesses. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. Special circumstances within the meaning of CPLR 3101 (subd. [a], par. [4]) have been sufficiently revealed to entitle plaintiff to examine both Venikoff and Griffin as material witnesses and to subpoena the record book of the hospital. These witnesses are subordinates of defendant and, since it is alleged that they participated in altering entries in the record book, the circumstances are sufficient to indicate that each of them is likely to be a reluctant and unwilling, if not a hostile witness. Munder, Acting P.J., Martuscello, Shapiro, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Polisar v. Linz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 1972
39 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)
Case details for

Polisar v. Linz

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT POLISAR, Appellant, v. ANDREW LINZ, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 3, 1972

Citations

39 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Citing Cases

Rupert v. Sellers

At Special Term these witnesses opposed the notice to examine them, but they have not appealed from the order…

Kenford Company, Inc. v. County of Erie

We agree with Special Term that a liberal construction should be accorded to the statutory discovery…