From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pokluda v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 28, 2014
Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-335 (GLS/ESH) (N.D.N.Y. Apr. 28, 2014)

Summary

observing that an administrative hearing comported with due process requirements because the claimant "received notifications prior to the hearing explaining the process and her rights" and "attended the hearing, testified, was able to hear and question all witnesses, and was allowed to present evidence"

Summary of this case from Adelman v. Colvin

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-335 (GLS/ESH)

04-28-2014

SARA POKLUDA Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Defendant.

APPEARANCES: FOR THE PLAINTIFF: Office of Stephen J. Mastaitis, Jr. 1412 Route 9P Saratoga Springs, New York 12866 FOR THE DEFENDANT: Social Security Administration Office of Regional General Counsel Region II 26 Federal Plaza - Room 3904 New York, New York 10278 OF COUNSEL: STEPHEN J. MASTAITIS, JR., ESQ. DAVID L. BROWN, ESQ. GRAHAM MORRISON, ESQ.


APPEARANCES:

FOR THE PLAINTIFF:

Office of Stephen J. Mastaitis, Jr.
1412 Route 9P
Saratoga Springs, New York 12866

FOR THE DEFENDANT:

Social Security Administration
Office of Regional General Counsel
Region II
26 Federal Plaza - Room 3904
New York, New York 10278 OF COUNSEL: STEPHEN J. MASTAITIS, JR.,
ESQ. DAVID L. BROWN, ESQ.
GRAHAM MORRISON, ESQ. GARY L. SHARPE, CHIEF JUDGE ORDER

The above-captioned matter comes to this court following a Report-Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Earl S. Hines, duly filed March 21, 2014. Following fourteen days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein.

No objections having been filed, and the court having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation for clear error, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Earl S. Hines filed March 21, 2014 (Dkt. No. 17) is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons stated therein; and it is further

ORDERED that Pokluda's request to remand this action is DENIED. The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED and Pokluda's complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk close this case and provide a copy of this Order to the parties in accordance to the local rules. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 28, 2014

Albany, New York

/s/_________

Gary L. Sharpe

Chief Judge,

U.S. District Court


Summaries of

Pokluda v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 28, 2014
Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-335 (GLS/ESH) (N.D.N.Y. Apr. 28, 2014)

observing that an administrative hearing comported with due process requirements because the claimant "received notifications prior to the hearing explaining the process and her rights" and "attended the hearing, testified, was able to hear and question all witnesses, and was allowed to present evidence"

Summary of this case from Adelman v. Colvin
Case details for

Pokluda v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:SARA POKLUDA Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Apr 28, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-335 (GLS/ESH) (N.D.N.Y. Apr. 28, 2014)

Citing Cases

Wells v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

"A claim of entitlement to social security benefits triggers Due Process Clause protections." Pokluda v.…

Singh v. City of New York

Therefore, Plaintiff has not stated a due process claim based on the ALJ's alleged failure to understand…