From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Poehlman v. Poehlman

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jan 31, 1917
102 A. 1052 (Md. 1917)

Opinion

Decided January 31st, 1917.

Divorce: adultery; acts after bill filed; custody of children pending bill; costs and counsel fees.

Costs and counsel fees may be allowed a wife, even after her appeal from a decree of divorce against her; and a final decree may be modified in that respect, even after a divorce a vinculo.

While a case is pending for the divorce of a wife on the ground of adultery, the Court may retain jurisdiction over the children, and direct that they remain in the custody of their father.

A decree of divorce can not be founded on acts of adultery committed subsequent to the filing of the bill.

Decided January 31st, 1917.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Baltimore County. (DUNCAN, J.)

The cause was argued before BOYD, C.J., BRISCOE, BURKE, THOMAS, PATTISON, URNER, STOCKBRIDGE, and CONSTABLE, JJ.

David Ash, for the appellant.

Richard S. Culbreth (with Harry B. Wolf on the brief), for the appellee.


already paid by the appellee under order of Court).


Summaries of

Poehlman v. Poehlman

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jan 31, 1917
102 A. 1052 (Md. 1917)
Case details for

Poehlman v. Poehlman

Case Details

Full title:ELLA L. POEHLMAN vs . JOHN N. POEHLMAN

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Jan 31, 1917

Citations

102 A. 1052 (Md. 1917)
102 A. 1052

Citing Cases

Pangle v. Pangle

This conclusion is in accord with the action taken in other cases of the same nature which this Court has had…

Oliver v. Oliver

This ruling seems to be a wide departure in policy from an unbroken line of previous decisions of this Court.…