From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Podrasnik v. Trust Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll
Feb 3, 1942
92 N.H. 65 (N.H. 1942)

Opinion

No. 3318.

Decided February 3, 1942.

Original jurisdiction to decree the distribution of decedents' estates is by statute vested solely in the Probate Court. An executor cannot maintain a petition for construction of the will and for instructions as to his duties in a fiduciary capacity, other than as executor, should the will be construed to create such duties. In such case the executor should file his account of the settlement of the estate accompanied by a petition for a decree of distribution of the balance found in his hands upon the settlement. Thereafter fiduciaries may apply for instructions as to their duties.

Cooper, Hall Grimes (by brief), for the plaintiff.

Snow Peyser (by brief), for the Rochester Trust Co.

Leonard C. Hardwick, by brief, for other defendants.

Frank R. Kenison, Attorney-General, and Ernest R. D'Amours, Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.


This case is a petition by an executrix for construction of a will; and instructions relating to her duties in a fiduciary capacity other than as executrix, if the will is construed to create such duties.

The first prayer of the petition is to have the proper distribution of the estate decided. Until the distribution is decided, the other prayers for relief cannot be acted upon. Original jurisdiction to decree the distribution is by statute vested solely in the Probate Court. This is settled by Revised Laws, c. 360, s. 7, which makes no substantial change in the law existing before the reenactment. It follows that the sole procedure is for the petitioner to file an account of her settlement of the estate accompanied with a petition for a decree of distribution of the balance found in her hands upon the settlement. Thereafter any trustee appointed to receive a share in the distribution and anyone having fiduciary duties thereunder may apply to the Superior Court for instructions in matters as to which they may properly be informed of their duties.

Petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Podrasnik v. Trust Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll
Feb 3, 1942
92 N.H. 65 (N.H. 1942)
Case details for

Podrasnik v. Trust Co.

Case Details

Full title:ADDIE E. PODRASNIK, Ex'x v. ROCHESTER TRUST CO. a

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll

Date published: Feb 3, 1942

Citations

92 N.H. 65 (N.H. 1942)
24 A.2d 493

Citing Cases

Tate v. Hooper

DUNCAN, J., dissenting: This decision in effect overrules the holding of Podrasnik v. Trust Co., 92 N.H. 65,…

Grinnell v. O'Brien

The questions propounded concerning the distribution of the corpus of the trust fund at the death of Caroline…