From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plumpe v. Tanner Motor Livery, Inc.

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Mar 23, 1934
137 Cal.App. 509 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934)

Opinion

Docket No. 9062.

March 23, 1934.

MOTION to dismiss appeal or affirm judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Leroy Dawson Judge. Judgment affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Ratzer, Bridge Gebhardt and H.A. Gebhardt for Appellant.

George L. Greer for Respondents.


This is an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit in favor of defendants and against the plaintiff. Upon the filing of appellant's opening brief respondents (defendants below) moved the dismissal of the appeal or the affirmance of the judgment.

An automobile with chauffeur was hired and the hirer's valet took the wheel with the hirer's consent. The vehicle upset and killed the hirer. His mother brought suit against the chauffeur and the owner.

[1] The hirer's consent to his valet's operation of the vehicle was in effect a complete assumption of all risks encountered thereby, so far as the chauffeur and the owner are concerned.

The judgment is affirmed.

Craig, J., and Hahn, J., pro tem., concurred.


Summaries of

Plumpe v. Tanner Motor Livery, Inc.

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Mar 23, 1934
137 Cal.App. 509 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934)
Case details for

Plumpe v. Tanner Motor Livery, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:OTTILLIE PLUMPE, Appellant, v. TANNER MOTOR LIVERY, INC. (a Corporation)…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two

Date published: Mar 23, 1934

Citations

137 Cal.App. 509 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934)
30 P.2d 1020

Citing Cases

Runnels v. Dixie Drive-It-Yourself

VI. Assumption of risk doctrine. Artificial I. C. Storage v. Martin, 102 Ind. App. 74, 198 N.E. 446; Benoit…