From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PLIS v. NORTH BAY CADILLAC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 15, 2004
5 A.D.3d 578 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2002-02872.

Decided March 15, 2004.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Warshawsky, J.), dated September 27, 2002, as granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant North Bay Cadillac.

Druckman Sinel, LLP, Ardsley, N.Y. (Robert L. Boydstun of counsel), for appellant.

Simmons, Jannace Stagg, LLP, East Meadow, N.Y. (William T. Collins III of counsel), for respondents.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P. GLORIA GOLDSTEIN STEPHEN G. CRANE WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff allegedly was injured when he tripped over a chain used to secure the premises of the defendant North Bay Cadillac (hereinafter North Bay). The black heavy-link steel chain was 15 to 20 feet long, suspended between 3-foot tall posts, and sagged to 12 to 14 inches off the ground at its lowest point.

The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against North Bay. The security chain was an open and obvious condition and was not inherently dangerous as a matter of law. Therefore, North Bay had no duty to warn of the condition and did not breach its duty to maintain its property in a reasonably safe condition ( see Gibbons v. Lido Point Lookout Fire Dist., 293 A.D.2d 646; Plessias v. Scalia Home for Funerals, 271 A.D.2d 423; cf. Cupo v. Karfunkel, 1 A.D.3d 48).

ALTMAN, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, CRANE and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

PLIS v. NORTH BAY CADILLAC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 15, 2004
5 A.D.3d 578 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

PLIS v. NORTH BAY CADILLAC

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT PLIS, appellant, v. NORTH BAY CADILLAC, ET AL., respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 15, 2004

Citations

5 A.D.3d 578 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
773 N.Y.S.2d 451

Citing Cases

Sneed v. Fulton Park Four Assocs.

However, there is no duty to protect or warn against an open and obvious condition which, as a matter of law,…

Silvestri v. Kohl's Dep't Stores, Inc.

Where a property's condition that caused a visitor to slip and fall is “open and obvious” and “not…