Opinion
Argued May 23, 1935 —
Decided October 9, 1935.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 114 N.J.L. 399.
For the appellant, Maurice C. Krivit.
For the respondent, Autenrieth Wortendyke.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, LLOYD, CASE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.