From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pleasant Homes Inc. v. Allied Bank of Dallas

Supreme Court of Texas
Jun 28, 1989
776 S.W.2d 153 (Tex. 1989)

Summary

holding that the return of service was sufficient where the return's reference to a "V.P." was deemed prima facie evidence of the person's identity

Summary of this case from Harvestons v. Narnia

Opinion

No. C-8100.

June 28, 1989.

Appeal from the District Court No. 101, Dallas County, Craig T. Enoch, J.

Joe N. Boudreaux, Gary Johnson, Dallas, for petitioners.

John A. Gilliam, Louis J. Weber, Jr., Charles A. Gall, Dallas, for respondent.


The application for writ of error of petitioners, Pleasant Homes, Inc. and Ray J. Stockman, is denied, as the default judgment was properly reversed on other grounds. In so doing, however, the majority of the court disapproves of the court of appeals' conclusion that a default judgment against a bank could not stand because the record on appeal did not affirmatively show that the individual at the bank, who was served with process in accordance with Texas Revised Civil Statutes article 342-915 (1989), was in fact the bank's vice-president, cashier, or agent for service. 757 S.W.2d 460, 462-63.

A return showing delivery of process to a vice-president or president, as authorized by applicable statute, is prima facie evidence that the person served is in fact the officer as designated. It is not necessary for either the petition or citation to designate the officer to be served by name if the face of the record affirmatively shows the person's authority. See Dentex Shoe Corp. v. F.E. Schmitz Co., 745 S.W.2d 503 (Tex.App. — Fort Worth 1988, writ denied); NRTRX Corp. v. Story, 582 S.W.2d 225 (Tex.Civ.App. — Fort Worth 1979, writ ref'd n.r.e.). A defendant who contends that the person served was not in fact a proper officer for service has the burden to present evidence to the trial court of improper service by motion for new trial or motion to set aside default judgment. Here, the defendant made no such showing. The statement in the return of service identifying Beverly Waters as a "V.P." indicates that she was a vice-president of the bank. This return would have been sufficient to sustain a default judgment.

HECHT, J., not sitting.


Summaries of

Pleasant Homes Inc. v. Allied Bank of Dallas

Supreme Court of Texas
Jun 28, 1989
776 S.W.2d 153 (Tex. 1989)

holding that the return of service was sufficient where the return's reference to a "V.P." was deemed prima facie evidence of the person's identity

Summary of this case from Harvestons v. Narnia

In Pleasant Homes, the Dallas court of appeals reversed a default judgment, holding that the judgment could not stand because the record on appeal did not affirmatively show that the individual at the defendant bank who was served with process was in fact the bank's vice-president, cashier, or agent for service.

Summary of this case from Natkin Service v. Winiarz

interpreting service under TEX.REV.CIV.STAT.ANN. art. 342-915 (Vernon 1989)

Summary of this case from Primate Const. v. Silver
Case details for

Pleasant Homes Inc. v. Allied Bank of Dallas

Case Details

Full title:PLEASANT HOMES, INC. and Ray J. Stockman, Petitioners, v. ALLIED BANK OF…

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: Jun 28, 1989

Citations

776 S.W.2d 153 (Tex. 1989)

Citing Cases

Natkin Service v. Winiarz

This return is prima facie evidence of the facts it recites, namely that service was accomplished through CT…

Primate Const. v. Silver

Southland Paint Co., 724 S.W.2d at 810; Brock, 74 S.W.2d at 438. We believe this issue was decided by the…