Opinion
No. 06-56540.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).
Filed May 6, 2008.
Peter J. Cavanagh, Ventura, CA, pro se.
Theresea E. Cavanagh, Ventura, CA, pro se.
W. Dean Freeman, Esq., AGCA — Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Appellee.
Appeal from the Ninth Circuit, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Pappas, Klein, and Brandt, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding. BAP No. CC-05-01245-PaBK.
Before: GRABER, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Peter J. Cavanagh and Theresea E. Cavanagh appeal pro se from the decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel ("BAP") affirming the bankruptcy court's order remanding to state court a criminal proceeding in which the Cavanaghs are defendants. We dismiss.
We lack jurisdiction to review the BAP's decision affirming the bankruptcy court's remand order. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1447(d), 1452(b); see also Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca, 516 U.S. 124, 127-29, 116 S.Ct. 494, 133 L.Ed.2d 461 (1995) (concluding that 28 U.S.C. §§ 1447(d) and 1452(b) bars appellate review of remand orders).
Appellants' request for judicial notice is denied as moot.