From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Planned Parenthood Fed'n of Am., Inc. v. Ctr. for Med. Progress

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 1, 2018
897 F.3d 1224 (9th Cir. 2018)

Opinion

No. 16-16997

08-01-2018

PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC.; Planned Parenthood: Shasta-Diablo, Inc., DBA Planned Parenthood Northern California ; Planned Parenthood Mar Monte, Inc.; Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest; Planned Parenthood Los Angeles; Planned Parenthood/Orange and San Bernardino Counties, Inc.; Planned Parenthood of Santa Barbara, Ventura and San Luis Obispo Counties, Inc. ; Planned Parenthood Pasadena and San Gabriel Valley, Inc.; Planned Parenthood Center for Choice; Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains; Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS; Biomax Procurement Services, LLC; David Daleiden, AKA Robert Daoud Sarkis; Sandra Susan Merritt, AKA Susan Tennenbaum; Gerardo Adrian Lopez, Defendants-Appellants, and Troy Newman; Phillip S. Cronin; Albin Rhomberg, Defendants.


ORDER

The concurrence opinion in the above-captioned matter filed on May 16, 2018, and published at 890 F.3d 828, is amended as follows:

At opinion page 838, delete the sentence: < I respectfully suggest that we should take this opportunity to fix this error in our court's precedent with a call of the case en banc.>

And replace the deleted sentence with: < Although the propriety of interlocutory appeals for denials of anti-SLAPP motions was not briefed by the parties in this case, I respectfully suggest that we take the opportunity to fix this error in the future.>The Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc remains pending.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Planned Parenthood Fed'n of Am., Inc. v. Ctr. for Med. Progress

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 1, 2018
897 F.3d 1224 (9th Cir. 2018)
Case details for

Planned Parenthood Fed'n of Am., Inc. v. Ctr. for Med. Progress

Case Details

Full title:PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC.; PLANNED PARENTHOOD…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 1, 2018

Citations

897 F.3d 1224 (9th Cir. 2018)

Citing Cases

Moreira-Brown v. Las Vegas Review Journal Inc.

The appropriate standard may be “failure to state a claim” under Federal Rule of Evidence 12. Planned…

Salveson v. Kessler

We have jurisdiction under the collateral order doctrine. See, e.g., Planned Parenthood Fed'n of Am., Inc. v.…