From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pitchford v. Southland

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Oct 5, 2009
333 F. App'x 138 (8th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-3340.

Submitted: September 23, 2009.

Filed: October 5, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Frederick L. Pitchford, Earle, AR, pro se.

Jane A. Kim, Wright Lindsey, Little Rock, AR, for Appellees.

Before BYE, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.


[UNPUBLISHED]


Frederick Lee Pitchford appeals the district court's dismissal of his employment discrimination complaint. Pitchford's only argument in his brief on appeal is that the district court lacked jurisdiction to rule on the motion to dismiss, because he failed to pay the filing fee below. This argument fails. See Rodgers ex rel. Janes v. Bowen, 790 F.2d 1550, 1552 (11th Cir. 1986) (noting that court had expressly rejected theory that timely payment of filing fee is jurisdictional requirement).

The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Accordingly, we affirm. We also deny the pending motion to vacate.


Summaries of

Pitchford v. Southland

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Oct 5, 2009
333 F. App'x 138 (8th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Pitchford v. Southland

Case Details

Full title:Frederick L. PITCHFORD, Appellant, v. SOUTHLAND GAMING AND RACING; Barry…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Oct 5, 2009

Citations

333 F. App'x 138 (8th Cir. 2009)