From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Piscitelli v. City of Garfield Zoning Bd. of Adjustment

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
May 21, 2018
195 A.3d 1280 (N.J. 2018)

Opinion

C-842 September Term 2017 079900

05-21-2018

Vincent PISCITELLI and Rose Mary Piscitelli, Plaintiffs-Petitioners, v. CITY OF GARFIELD ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT; et al., Defendants, and DSJ Family Trust; Daniel P. Conte, III, Stacey A. Conte and Jamie G. Kreshpane, Trustees of the DSJ Family Trust; and Dr. Daniel P. Conte, Jr., Defendants-Respondents.


To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in A-002616-15 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted limited to the issues related to the alleged conflicts of interests of some members of the Zoning Board of Adjustment.


Summaries of

Piscitelli v. City of Garfield Zoning Bd. of Adjustment

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
May 21, 2018
195 A.3d 1280 (N.J. 2018)
Case details for

Piscitelli v. City of Garfield Zoning Bd. of Adjustment

Case Details

Full title:Vincent PISCITELLI and Rose Mary Piscitelli, Plaintiffs-Petitioners, v…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: May 21, 2018

Citations

195 A.3d 1280 (N.J. 2018)
235 N.J. 392