Piro v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.

Full title: SALVATORE PIRO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS…

Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Nov 25, 1968

247 A.2d 667 (N.J. 1968)

247 A.2d 667

Opinion

Argued November 6, 1968 —

Decided November 25, 1968.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Geoffrey Gaulkin argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Beggans and Keale, attorneys).

Mr. Arthur N. D'Italia argued the cause for respondent ( Messrs. Warren, Chasan, Leyner Holland, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Appellate Division, 103 N.J. Super. 456.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.