From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Piontka v. Suffolk County Police Department

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 7, 1994
202 A.D.2d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 7, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Copertino, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the applicable period of limitations in this case was one year and 90 days (see, County Law § 52; see also, Mills v. County of Monroe, 59 N.Y.2d 307, affg 89 A.D.2d 776, cert denied 464 U.S. 1018). Accordingly, the complaint was properly dismissed as time barred. Mangano, P.J., Pizzuto, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Piontka v. Suffolk County Police Department

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 7, 1994
202 A.D.2d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Piontka v. Suffolk County Police Department

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN PIONTKA, Appellant, v. SUFFOLK COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 7, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
608 N.Y.S.2d 503

Citing Cases

Zarate v. Nassau County Medical Center

A notice of claim was required because the plaintiff sought only to vindicate her individual interests, in…

Weslowski v. Zugibe

Nevertheless, Zugibe and Fortunato were entitled to dismissal of the seventh cause of action insofar as…