From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pineda v. Golden Valley Health Ctrs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION
Jan 31, 2012
Case No.: 1:11 CV 01399 AWI BAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11 CV 01399 AWI BAM

01-31-2012

TAMMY PINEDA and SERGIO PINEDA, Plaintiffs, v. GOLDEN VALLEY HEALTH CENTERS; MODESTO RADIOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP, INC.; MODESTO RADIOLOGY IMAGING; AJIT S. NIJJAR, M.D.; JOSEPH FLUENCE, M.D.; WARREN DAVID CLIFT, M.D.; STANFORD HOSPITAL AND CLINICS; and DOES 1-100, Inclusive, Defendants.

SCARLETT LAW GROUP Randall H. Scarlett Attorneys for Plaintiffs TAMMY PINEDA and SERGIO PINEDA SHEUERMAN, MARTINI & TABARI David Sheuerman Anne Hilleary Attorneys for Defendant STANFORD HOSPITAL & CLINICS McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD WAYTE & CARRUTH Matthew Hawkins Attorneys for Defendant JOSEPH FLUENCE, M.D. OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Alyson A. Berg Counsel for Defendant UNITED STATES RIGGIO MORDAUNT & KELLY Peter Kelley Attorneys for Defendants AJIT S. Nijjar, M.D. and MODESTO RADIOLOGICAL MEDICAL GROUP, INC.


David Sheuerman (SBN 78132)

Anne Hilleary (SBN 136106)

SHEUERMAN, MARTINI & TABARI

A Professional Corporation

Attorneys for Defendant

STANFORD HOSPITAL & CLINICS

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT STANFORD

HOSPITAL & CLINICS

It is hereby stipulated by and among all parties having appeared in the above-entitled action, through their designated counsel of record, that the hearing on the Motion for Summary Judgment on behalf of defendant STANFORD HOSPITAL & CLINICS will be continued to April 9, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 2. The dates for the Opposition and Reply papers will run with the new hearing date of April 9, 2012.

It is further stipulated by and among the parties that this Stipulation may be signed in counterparts and that a faxed copy will have the same validity as an original.

SCARLETT LAW GROUP

By: Randall H. Scarlett

Randall H. Scarlett

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

TAMMY PINEDA and

SERGIO PINEDA

SHEUERMAN, MARTINI & TABARI

By: David Sheuerman

David Sheuerman

Anne Hilleary

Attorneys for Defendant

STANFORD HOSPITAL & CLINICS

McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD

WAYTE & CARRUTH

By: Matthew Hawkins

Matthew Hawkins

Attorneys for Defendant

JOSEPH FLUENCE, M.D.

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES

ATTORNEY

By: Alyson A. Berg

Alyson A. Berg

Counsel for Defendant

UNITED STATES

RIGGIO MORDAUNT & KELLY

By: Stephanie Roundy for

Peter Kelley

Attorneys for Defendants

AJIT S. Nijjar, M.D. and MODESTO

RADIOLOGICAL MEDICAL GROUP,

INC.

ORDER

Having reviewed and considered the foregoing stipulation of the parties,

IT IS ORDERED that the hearing on the Motion for Summary Judgment on behalf of defendant STANFORD HOSPITAL & CLINICS is continued to April 9, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 2. The dates for the Opposition and Reply papers will run with the new hearing date of April 9, 2012.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Pineda v. Golden Valley Health Ctrs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION
Jan 31, 2012
Case No.: 1:11 CV 01399 AWI BAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2012)
Case details for

Pineda v. Golden Valley Health Ctrs.

Case Details

Full title:TAMMY PINEDA and SERGIO PINEDA Plaintiffs, v. GOLDEN VALLEY HEALTH…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION

Date published: Jan 31, 2012

Citations

Case No.: 1:11 CV 01399 AWI BAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2012)