From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pilsener Bottling v. Sunset Park Indus. Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 14, 1994
201 A.D.2d 548 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Summary

holding waiver applicable to landlord's employee as well as to landlord where employee allegedly caused a fire

Summary of this case from H & M Hennes & Mauritz LP v. Skanska USA Building, Inc.

Opinion

February 14, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant, Sunset Park Industrial Associates (hereinafter Sunset), as landlord, entered into a lease with the plaintiff, Pilsener Bottling Company, Inc. (hereinafter Pilsener). The agreement included a subrogation-waiver clause which stated: "Landlord and Tenant hereby waive the right of recovery, one against the other, with respect to losses covered by policies of insurance protecting against fire, extended coverage, vandalism and sprinkler leakage occasioned by either Landlord or Tenant to the extent that such losses or damage is covered by a valid, collectible policy or policies of insurance." The defendant Vic Lambe, while acting within the scope of his employment for Sunset, accidentally caused a fire which damaged Pilsener's inventory. Pilsener was paid by its insurance company, which then brought this action in Pilsener's name seeking reimbursement for the money it paid out. The respondents contend that the clause covers not only Sunset as landlord, but Sunset's employee Lambe.

We agree with the respondents that the subrogation-waiver clause is applicable to the employees, agents and/or servants of the parties. As a general rule, a contract should be construed so as to give force and effect to all of its provisions (see, Muzak Corp. v. Hotel Taft Corp., 1 N.Y.2d 42, 46).

A reading of the entire lease illustrates that the parties intended to include agents or employees within the meaning of the term "Landlord", under the subrogation-waiver clause of the lease. It appears that the parties anticipated that the parties would operate through employees, agents, or servants (cf., Howard v. Finnegans Warehouse Corp., 33 A.D.2d 1090; Federal Ins. Co. v. Zwicker Elec. Co., 144 A.D.2d 632). Sullivan, J.P., Rosenblatt, Copertino and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pilsener Bottling v. Sunset Park Indus. Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 14, 1994
201 A.D.2d 548 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

holding waiver applicable to landlord's employee as well as to landlord where employee allegedly caused a fire

Summary of this case from H & M Hennes & Mauritz LP v. Skanska USA Building, Inc.

In Pilsener Bottling Co. v. Sunset Park Indus. Assocs., 201 A.D.2d 548 (2d Dep't 1994), the Appellate Division, in affirming summary judgment, held that the subrogation-waiver clause in the contract between the parties was applicable to the employees, agents and/or servants of the parties, that a reading of the entire lease illustrated that the parties intended to include agents or employees within the meaning of the term "landlord", under the subrogation-waiver clause of the lease.

Summary of this case from Phila. Indem. Ins. Co. v. The Jemstone Grp.
Case details for

Pilsener Bottling v. Sunset Park Indus. Assoc

Case Details

Full title:PILSENER BOTTLING COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. SUNSET PARK INDUSTRIAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 14, 1994

Citations

201 A.D.2d 548 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
607 N.Y.S.2d 961

Citing Cases

Phila. Indem. Ins. Co. v. The Jemstone Grp.

The issue before the court is whether the waiver of the right to subrogation extends to the Landlord's…

FEDERAL INS. CO. v. LCOR INCORPORATED

On the present motion, movants fail to make a prima facie case that LCOR may rely on the Prime Lease's waiver…