From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierce v. Lopez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 28, 2013
Case No. EDCV 11-0641-GAF (JEM) (C.D. Cal. May. 28, 2013)

Summary

finding that a prosecutor eavesdropping on a conversation between defendant and counsel did not amount to a violation of the right to counsel "without a showing of prejudice"

Summary of this case from United States v. Kemmerer

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 11-0641-GAF (JEM)

05-28-2013

SEBREN A. PIERCE, Petitioner, v. PAUL LOPEZ, Warden, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge filed concurrently herewith,

IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the action is dismissed with prejudice.

___________

GARY A. FEESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Pierce v. Lopez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 28, 2013
Case No. EDCV 11-0641-GAF (JEM) (C.D. Cal. May. 28, 2013)

finding that a prosecutor eavesdropping on a conversation between defendant and counsel did not amount to a violation of the right to counsel "without a showing of prejudice"

Summary of this case from United States v. Kemmerer
Case details for

Pierce v. Lopez

Case Details

Full title:SEBREN A. PIERCE, Petitioner, v. PAUL LOPEZ, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 28, 2013

Citations

Case No. EDCV 11-0641-GAF (JEM) (C.D. Cal. May. 28, 2013)

Citing Cases

United States v. Kemmerer

For example, Mr. Kemmerer has not articulated how being unable to speak to his attorney confidentially for…