Pickens v. Chrones

Full title: ANDRE DESHAWN PICKENS, Petitioner, v. LEANN CHRONES, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Dec 22, 2010

CV 06-5297 JFW(JC) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2010)

Opinion

ANDRE DESHAWN PICKENS, Petitioner, v. LEANN CHRONES, Warden, Respondent.  No. CV 06-5297 JFW(JC). United States District Court, C.D. California. December 22, 2010.

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          JOHN F. WALTER, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the operative First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (the "Petition") and all of the records herein, including the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report and Recommendation"), and petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation ("Objections"). The Court has further made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge and overrules the Objections.

         IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the Judgment herein on petitioner and counsel for respondent.

         LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.