From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Piccone v. Dickinson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Jun 10, 2013
C.A. NO. 12-cv-30127-MAP (D. Mass. Jun. 10, 2013)

Opinion

C.A. NO. 12-cv-30127-MAP

06-10-2013

LOUIS A. PICCONE, Plaintiff v. TROOPER DICKINSON, ET AL, Defendants


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE:

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WITH REGARD TO

DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DIMISS

(Dkt. Nos. 31, 36, 64, 66, 69, 73, 77, 79, 82 & 105)

PONSOR, U.S. D.J.

Having reviewed the substance of Judge Kenneth P. Neiman's Report and Recommendation dated May 15, 2013 and finding it meritorious, and noting that there is no objection, the court, upon de novo review, hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 105). Based upon this, Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 31, 36, 64, 66, 69, 73, 77, 79 & 82) are hereby ALLOWED. The claims against Defendant Amuso are hereby DISMISSED, sua sponte. The clerk will enter judgment for Defendants. This case may now be closed.

It is So Ordered.

________________

MICHAEL A. PONSOR

U. S. District Judge


Summaries of

Piccone v. Dickinson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Jun 10, 2013
C.A. NO. 12-cv-30127-MAP (D. Mass. Jun. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Piccone v. Dickinson

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS A. PICCONE, Plaintiff v. TROOPER DICKINSON, ET AL, Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Date published: Jun 10, 2013

Citations

C.A. NO. 12-cv-30127-MAP (D. Mass. Jun. 10, 2013)

Citing Cases

Pollard v. Georgetown Sch. Dist.

Because this tort claim sounds in negligence, the presentment requirement applies, and for the reasons stated…