From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phoenix Baptist Hosp. Med. Center v. Heckler

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 19, 1985
776 F.2d 877 (9th Cir. 1985)

Opinion

No. 84-2732.

November 19, 1985.

Patric Hooper, Weissburg Aronson, Inc., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Michael R. Power, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellee.

Before ANDERSON and CANBY, Circuit Judges and IDEMAN District Judge.

The Honorable James M. Ideman, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.


ORDER

The opinion in this case, filed August 5, 1985, and appearing at 767 F.2d 1304, is modified as follows:

Replace footnote 5 at page 1307 with the following:

The Secretary's liquidity requirement is reasonably derived from the regulatory purpose of funding depreciation "as a means of conserving funds for the replacement of depreciable assets." 42 C.F.R. § 405.415(e). The requirement represents no more than "a fine tuning of doctrine that does not require rulemaking unless it imposes severe hardship or circumvents existing rules." Cities v. FERC, 723 F.2d 656, 659 (9th Cir. 1984).

The opinion having been so amended the petition for rehearing is denied. The full court having been advised of the amendment, and no judge having objected to the amendment or having called for rehearing en banc, the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.


Summaries of

Phoenix Baptist Hosp. Med. Center v. Heckler

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 19, 1985
776 F.2d 877 (9th Cir. 1985)
Case details for

Phoenix Baptist Hosp. Med. Center v. Heckler

Case Details

Full title:PHOENIX BAPTIST HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., A NONPROFIT CORPORATION DBA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 19, 1985

Citations

776 F.2d 877 (9th Cir. 1985)

Citing Cases

Vallejo General Hosp. v. Bowen

We review de novo a district court's award of summary judgment affirming a decision of the Secretary in a…

Memorial Rehabilitation Hospital of Santa Barbara v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

We afford deference to an agency's construction of its own regulation because its expertise makes it…