From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phillips v. Burton

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Apr 6, 2022
507 P.3d 194 (Nev. 2022)

Summary

rejecting an argument that a loan remains wholly due after the rescission of a notice of default that accelerated the loan

Summary of this case from 6344 Legend Falls Tr. v. Nat'l Default Servicing Corp.

Opinion

No. 84411

04-06-2022

Todd Matthew PHILLIPS; and Ali Shahrokhi, Petitioners, v. The Honorable Rebecca BURTON, District Judge; the Honorable Charles J. Hoskin, District Judge; the Honorable Dawn Throne, District Judge; the Honorable Vincent Ochoa, District Judge; the Honorable Mathew Harter, District Judge; Jon Norheim, Hearing Master; Aaron D. Ford, Nevada Attorney General; and Steven B. Wolfson, Clark County District Attorney, Respondents, and Amber Korpak; and Kizzy Burrow, Real Parties in Interest.

Ali Shahrokhi Todd Matthew Phillips Hutchison & Steffen, LLC/Las Vegas



DENIED.


Summaries of

Phillips v. Burton

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Apr 6, 2022
507 P.3d 194 (Nev. 2022)

rejecting an argument that a loan remains wholly due after the rescission of a notice of default that accelerated the loan

Summary of this case from 6344 Legend Falls Tr. v. Nat'l Default Servicing Corp.
Case details for

Phillips v. Burton

Case Details

Full title:Todd Matthew PHILLIPS; and Ali Shahrokhi, Petitioners, v. The Honorable…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Apr 6, 2022

Citations

507 P.3d 194 (Nev. 2022)

Citing Cases

6344 Legend Falls Tr. v. Nat'l Default Servicing Corp.

NRS 106.240 explains how liens on property are cleared from the public record. Specifically, it “provides…

SFR Invs. Pool 1 v. Nationstar Mortg.

The First Recission means that NRS § 106.240 is inapplicable and SFR's claim based on NRS § 106.240 fails as…