From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phillips Co. v. Mach. Prod

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 1, 1950
94 N.E.2d 701 (Ohio 1950)

Opinion

No. 32024

Decided November 1, 1950.

Supreme Court — Affirmance — Judges equally divided — Action on account against buyer for goods manufactured by seller — Buyer instructed seller not to deliver goods manufactured on order — Remedies — Action on account, or for breach of contract — Sales — Title passes, when — Verdict and judgment for seller.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Summit county.

Messrs. Buckingham, Doolittle Burroughs and Mr. Wm. T. Walker, for appellee.

Messrs. Harris, Sacks Subrin and Mr. Samuel Goldman, for appellant.


It appearing that the judges of the court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of this case (one judge not participating) and are for that reason unable to agree upon a judgment, and the entry of that fact constituting an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, that judgment is hereby affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.

FAUGHT, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Phillips Co. v. Mach. Prod

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 1, 1950
94 N.E.2d 701 (Ohio 1950)
Case details for

Phillips Co. v. Mach. Prod

Case Details

Full title:THE THOMAS PHILLIPS CO., APPELLEE v. DOVER MACHINE PRODUCTS, INC.…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Nov 1, 1950

Citations

94 N.E.2d 701 (Ohio 1950)
94 N.E.2d 701

Citing Cases

Greenberg v. Lee

They contained statements of reasons for the emergency, but an attack was made upon them as contravening the…