From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phillipe v. Am. Express Travel Related Serv

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 1, 1992
188 A.D.2d 268 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

December 1, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick, J.).


"[F]or the action to proceed as a class action, plaintiff must demonstrate factually that [she] represent[s] a genuine class * * * and that there is merit to the action on behalf of such class" (Reiken v Nationwide Leisure Corp., 75 A.D.2d 551, 553; see also, Simon v Cunard Line, 75 A.D.2d 283, 288). The court properly granted defendant's motion with respect to those matters not necessary to support plaintiff's application for class status.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Ross and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

Phillipe v. Am. Express Travel Related Serv

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 1, 1992
188 A.D.2d 268 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Phillipe v. Am. Express Travel Related Serv

Case Details

Full title:LORRAINE PHILLIPE, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1992

Citations

188 A.D.2d 268 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

Pesantez v. Boyle Envtl. Servs., Inc.

All claims as against Greaney are automatically stayed by its filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (…