Summary
affording utility opportunity to seek recovery of increased costs in a base rate proceeding
Summary of this case from Verizon Pa. LLC v. Pa. Pub. Util. Comm'nOpinion
Argued January 26, 1994.
Decided February 15, 1994.
Appeal Nos. 21, 22 and 23 M.D. Appeal Dkt. 1993 from Order of Commonwealth Court, 149 Pa. Commw. 247, 613 A.2d 74 (1992), entered July 16, 1992, at No. 2190 C.D. 1990, Affirming in Part and Reversing in Part Order of Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission entered September 20, 1990, at Docket No. R-891468, and Remanding to Commission.
John F. Povilaitis, Veronica A. Smith, Lawrence F. Barth, Harrisburg, for Pa. P.U.C.
Michael W. Gang, Michael W. Hassell, Harrisburg, for Columbia Gas of Pa., Inc.
Edmund J. Berger, Mary C. Kenney, Harrisburg, for Office of Consumer Advocate-intervenor in Nos. 21 and 22 M.D. Appeal Dkt. 1993.
David M. Kleppinger, Harrisburg, for Columbia Industrial-intervenor.
Craig R. Burgraff, Kent D. Murphy, Edmund J. Berger, Mary C. Kenney, Harrisburg, for Office of Consumer Advocate, intervenor in No. 23 M.D. Appeal Dkt. 1993.
Before NIX, C.J., and FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS, CAPPY, CASTILLE and MONTEMURO, JJ.
ORDER
Order affirmed.
MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation as Senior Justice pursuant to Judicial Assignment Docket No. 94 R1800, due to the unavailability of LARSEN, J., see No. 127 Judicial Administration Docket No. 1, filed October 28, 1993.