From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PFZ Properties, Inc. v. Rodriguez

U.S.
Mar 9, 1992
503 U.S. 257 (1992)

Opinion

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

No. 91-122

Argued February 26, 1992 Decided March 9, 1992

Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 928 F.2d 28.

Thomas Richichi argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Albert J. Beveridge III, Kathryn E. Szmuszkovicz, and Jose Luis Novas-Dueno.

Vanessa Ramirez-Kausz, Assistant Solicitor General of Puerto Rico, argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief were Jorge E. Perez-Diaz, Attorney General, and Anabelle Rodriguez-Rodriguez, Solicitor General.

Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed for the Institute for Justice by William H. Mellor III, Clint Bolick, and Jonathan W. Emord; for the Pacific Legal Foundation by Ronald A. Zumbrun, Edward J. Connor, Jr., and Timothy A. Bittle; and for the Washington Legal Foundation et al. by Charles T. Smith II, Steven A. Loewy, Daniel J. Popeo, John C. Scully, and Richard A. Samp.
Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed for the State of Maryland et al. by J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General of Maryland, Carmen M. Shepard and Andrew H. Baida, Assistant Attorneys General, Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General of Florida, and Michael E. Carpenter, Attorney General of Maine; for the Council of State Governments et al. by Richard Ruda, Michael G. Dzialo, and Donald B. Ayer; and for the Municipal Art Society of New York, Inc., by William E. Hegarty, Michael S. Gruen, Philip K. Howard, Norman Marcus, and Philip Weinberg.


The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.


Summaries of

PFZ Properties, Inc. v. Rodriguez

U.S.
Mar 9, 1992
503 U.S. 257 (1992)
Case details for

PFZ Properties, Inc. v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:PFZ PROPERTIES, INC. v . RODRIGUEZ ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 9, 1992

Citations

503 U.S. 257 (1992)

Citing Cases

Freeman v. Planning Board of West Boylston

The jury were instructed that, as matter of law, actions taken by the board were "under color of state law,"…

United States v. Williams

We have frequently dismissed the writ as improvidently granted after the case has been briefed and argued; in…