From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petraglia v. American Motorists Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 30, 1982
498 Pa. 32 (Pa. 1982)

Opinion

Argued September 15, 1981.

Decided April 30, 1982.

Appeal No. 81-1-27, from the Order of the Superior Court at No. 699 April Term, 1979, affirming the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Civil Division, at No. GD 78-16741; J. Warren Watson and Richard G. Zeleznik, JJ.

Richard D. Gilardi, Alfred S. Pelaez, Gilardi Cooper, P.A., Pittsburgh, for appellant.

Charles Kirshner, Pittsburgh, for appellee.

Before O'BRIEN, C. J., and ROBERTS, NIX, LARSEN and FLAHERTY, JJ.


ORDER


Order, 284 Pa. Super. 1, 424 A.2d 1360, Affirmed. See Schreiber v. Pennsylvania Lumberman's Mutual Insurance Co., 498 Pa. 21, 444 A.2d 647 (1982).

NIX, J., files a concurring opinion.

KAUFFMAN and WILKINSON, JJ., did not participate in the decision of this case.


The record in this case does not present a situation warranting equitable intervention; see, e.g., Schreiber v. Pennsylvania Lumberman's Mutual Insurance Company, 498 Pa. 21, 26, 444 A.2d 647, 649 (1982) (Nix, J. dissenting). Therefore I concur in the result.


Summaries of

Petraglia v. American Motorists Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 30, 1982
498 Pa. 32 (Pa. 1982)
Case details for

Petraglia v. American Motorists Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Paul PETRAGLIA, Appellant, v. AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 30, 1982

Citations

498 Pa. 32 (Pa. 1982)
444 A.2d 653

Citing Cases

Nelson v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.

A suit limitation clause is also subject to the defense of estoppel. [Petraglia v. American Motorists Ins.…

Murphy v. Prudential Prop. Cas. Ins. Co.

Hereinafter referred to as the No-Fault Act or the Act. The rule of law to be applied when a summary judgment…