From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitpain v. Curti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 10, 2000
269 A.D.2d 376 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted December 15, 1999

February 10, 2000

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), dated March 8, 1999, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Fred M. Schwartz, Smithtown, N.Y., for appellant.

Devitt, Spellman, Barrett, Callahan, Leyden Kenney, LLP, Smithtown, N.Y. (Patricia A. O'Connor and Laure C. Nolan of counsel), for respondent.

GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., DAVID S. RITTER, DANIEL W. JOY, LEO F. McGINITY.


DECISION ORDER


ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries he sustained when, while visiting the defendant at her house, he was attacked by the defendant's estranged husband. The defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and submitted evidence establishing her entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. The plaintiff failed to submit evidence raising a triable issue of fact as to whether the incident in question was reasonably foreseeable.

The plaintiff's belief that additional discovery might reveal something helpful to his case does not provide a basis pursuant toCPLR 3212(f) for postponing a determination of a motion for summary judgment (see, Cooper v. Milton Paper Co., 258 A.D.2d 614 ;Agoglia v. Sterling Foster Co., 237 A.D.2d 549 ; Plotkin v. Franklin, 179 A.D.2d 746 ).


Summaries of

Petitpain v. Curti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 10, 2000
269 A.D.2d 376 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Petitpain v. Curti

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT PETITPAIN, appellant, v. PAULA CURTI, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 10, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 376 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
702 N.Y.S.2d 115

Citing Cases

Riveros v. Custom Design Homes

This court determined that plaintiff's counsel, despite multiple orders directing a deposition, chartered his…

Marotta v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.

Defendants' belief that additional discovery might reveal something helpful to the case does not provide a…