affirming admission of four-year-old child declarant's statements made during sex abuse evaluation because evidence was sufficient to support determination that child understood the nature of the examination and, thus, her "answers were motivated by desire for medical diagnosis or treatment"
Summary of this case from State v. S.PAugust 6, 1991.
affirming admission of four-year-old child declarant's statements made during sex abuse evaluation because evidence was sufficient to support determination that child understood the nature of the examination and, thus, her "answers were motivated by desire for medical diagnosis or treatment"
Summary of this case from State v. S.PFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Aug 6, 1991
Mother's statements were, thus, made in the context of, and were informed by, that explanation. See State v.…
Weidner v. ZenonExcept where a different procedure is specified by habeas corpus statutes, the procedures in the Oregon Rules…