holding that a letter from the agency's legal counsel was not an order under ORS 183.310 but, nonetheless, the circuit court did not have jurisdiction to entertain the plaintiff's claim for declaratory relief because the agency "is subject to the APA; therefore, the APA provides the exclusive methods for its actions and for review of those actions"
Summary of this case from Lone Oak Racing, Inc. v. StateJanuary 18, 1989.
holding that a letter from the agency's legal counsel was not an order under ORS 183.310 but, nonetheless, the circuit court did not have jurisdiction to entertain the plaintiff's claim for declaratory relief because the agency "is subject to the APA; therefore, the APA provides the exclusive methods for its actions and for review of those actions"
Summary of this case from Lone Oak Racing, Inc. v. Stateaffirming dismissal of mother's complaint, which sought emotional distress damages arising from the defendants' negligent inoculation of her children with live virus vaccine
Summary of this case from Curtis v. MRI Imaging Services IIFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 18, 1989
This workers' compensation case is before us for the third time. We take the facts from our opinion in Knapp…
Wallace v. State ex rel Public Emp. Ret. Bd.The premise that an agency has initial authority under the APA to resolve a dispute over the agency's actions…