affirming juvenile court's denial of petition to “invalidate” foster care placement based on purported ICWA noncompliance; record did not establish that, as of the time the child was placed, ICWA applied, and subsequent determination that the child was an Indian child did not render ICWA retroactively applicable to prior actions of the juvenile court
Summary of this case from In re A.R.V.S.March 11, 1986.
affirming juvenile court's denial of petition to “invalidate” foster care placement based on purported ICWA noncompliance; record did not establish that, as of the time the child was placed, ICWA applied, and subsequent determination that the child was an Indian child did not render ICWA retroactively applicable to prior actions of the juvenile court
Summary of this case from In re A.R.V.S.referring to "the presumption against the right to appointed counsel"
Summary of this case from Murphy v. Board of Parolenoting that the ICWA applies when the court "knows or has reason to know that an Indian child is involved"
Summary of this case from State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. CainFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Mar 11, 1986
Compare United Foam Corp. v. Whiddon, 92 Or. App. 492, 758 P.2d 435 (1988) with SAIF v. Fisher, 100 Or. App.…
Wright v. SaifArgued and submitted July 26, 1985.Affirmed November 20, 1985. Reconsideration denied January 31, 1986.…