Summary
holding that evidence was sufficient for conviction of delivery where the defendant possessed controlled substance and admitted having acquired the drugs to sell
Summary of this case from State v. NewstedOpinion
October 13, 1988.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review Allowed and Denied
Oregon Supreme Court
Oct 13, 1988
307 Or. 77 (Or. 1988)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review Allowed and Denied
Oregon Supreme Court
Oct 13, 1988
307 Or. 77 (Or. 1988)
holding that evidence was sufficient for conviction of delivery where the defendant possessed controlled substance and admitted having acquired the drugs to sell
Summary of this case from State v. Newstedexplaining that, because the statutes governing delivery of controlled substances do not define ‘attempt’ or ‘attempted transfer,’ the definition of ‘attempt’ in ORS 161.405 applies
Summary of this case from State v. Newstedexplaining that, because the statutes governing delivery of controlled substances do not define "attempt" or "attempted transfer," the definition of "attempt" in ORS 161.405 applies
Summary of this case from State v. Alvarez-Garciaconstruing an earlier version of ORS 656.268
Summary of this case from Cameron v. Norco Contract Serviceconstruing an earlier version of ORS 656.268
Summary of this case from Sandoval v. Crystal PineCase details for
Petitions for Review Allowed and Denied
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Oct 13, 1988
Citations
307 Or. 77 (Or. 1988)
Citing Cases
State v. Racicot
106 Or App at 563. In State v. Franske, 92 Or. App. 353, 758 P.2d 418, rev den 307 Or. 77 (1988), the…
State v. Newsted"Possessing a controlled substance with the intent to transfer it may constitute a substantial step toward…