Summary
holding that the word "suits" in an insurance policy encompassed administrative proceedings
Summary of this case from Schnitzer Investment v. Certain UnderwritersOpinion
April 6, 1983.
holding that the word "suits" in an insurance policy encompassed administrative proceedings
Summary of this case from Schnitzer Investment v. Certain UnderwritersApril 6, 1983.
holding that the word "suits" in an insurance policy encompassed administrative proceedings
Summary of this case from Schnitzer Investment v. Certain Underwritersconcluding that trial court had erred in granting defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the crime of unlawfully transporting fish based on assertions similar to those advanced in Smith, noting that "the trial court confused matters of jurisdiction with matters of defense"
Summary of this case from State v. Hillaffirming reformation of deed to reflect plaintiff's signature where evidence clearly showed plaintiff intended to sign deed and, by the mutual mistake of parties, failed to do so
Summary of this case from Smith v. Royal Automotive Group, Inc.allowing insured's recovery of indemnity and defense costs
Summary of this case from W. Hills Dev. Co. v. Chartis Claims, Inc.explaining that the purpose of the “may be liable” language in Rule 22 “is to promote the expeditious and economical adjudication in a single action of the entire subject matter arising from a set of facts, including claims contingent on the determination of other issues in the case”
Summary of this case from Riverview Condo. Ass'n, an Or. Non-Profit Corp. v. Cypress Ventures, Inc.Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Apr 6, 1983
Courts addressing the issue have consistently held that it is not contrary to public policy to insure against…
W. Hills Dev. Co. v. Chartis Claims, Inc.Nor do they dispute the application of the statute to a case seeking to recover damages suffered as attorney…