From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
May 2, 2001
332 Or. 137 (Or. 2001)

Summary

observing overhead flashing lights on "police and tow vehicles * * * often are activated" to alert "other drivers to their presence and to the fact that a hazard exists at the roadside," and that "[t]here is nothing uncommon or psychologically intimidating about such a setting generally"

Summary of this case from State v. Kuehne

Opinion

May 1, 2001

May 2, 2001

May 1, 2001


Summaries of

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
May 2, 2001
332 Or. 137 (Or. 2001)

observing overhead flashing lights on "police and tow vehicles * * * often are activated" to alert "other drivers to their presence and to the fact that a hazard exists at the roadside," and that "[t]here is nothing uncommon or psychologically intimidating about such a setting generally"

Summary of this case from State v. Kuehne

describing permissible means of establishing hostility

Summary of this case from Union Cemetery Assoc. v. Coyer

describing permissible means of establishing hostility

Summary of this case from Harrell v. Tilley

disavowing State v. Walp, 65 Or. App. 781, 672 P.2d 374

Summary of this case from State v. Snow
Case details for

Petitions for Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: May 2, 2001

Citations

332 Or. 137 (Or. 2001)

Citing Cases

State v. Ciancanelli

As we have noted, however, Henry was a narrow decision, involving a different historical exception and a…

Union Cemetery Assoc. v. Coyer

The statute therefore does not apply in this case. See Or Laws 1989, ch 1069, § 4; Mid-Valley Resources, Inc.…