Summary
finding error where ERB resorted to extrinsic evidence when contract provisions were not ambiguous
Summary of this case from Oregon U.S.Opinion
1995.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1995
320 Or. 567 (Or. 1995)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1995
320 Or. 567 (Or. 1995)
finding error where ERB resorted to extrinsic evidence when contract provisions were not ambiguous
Summary of this case from Oregon U.S.interpreting a single-limit policy to include equal "each person" limit and "each accident" limit
Summary of this case from Grijalva v. Safeco Ins. Co.describing historical reasons for allowing plaintiff to bring property damage and personal injury claims separately against the same defendant
Summary of this case from Steele v. a B Automotive Towing Service, Inc.Case details for
Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1995
Citations
320 Or. 567 (Or. 1995)
Citing Cases
Windsor Insurance v. Judd
Argued and submitted October 25, 1993 Affirmed October 12, 1994 Petition for review allowed February 7, 1995…
Wicks-Snodgrass v. City of Reedsortfn4 The notice provisions of ORS 227.173(3) and ORS 215.416(10) have nothing to do with when a decision…