From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Aug 14, 2001
332 Or. 430 (Or. 2001)

Summary

concluding that, although incarceration alone is not sufficient, "a recurring pattern of criminal conduct and incarceration," in combination with other factors weighing against fitness, can justify termination of parental rights

Summary of this case from State ex rel Dept. of Human Services v. R. J. T

Opinion

August 7, 2001

August 7, 2001

August 14, 2001 Butte Creek Association v. Marion County and Bielenberg (A106270) (S48564) ( 174 Or. App. 149) Hunter v. West Linn-Wilsonville School District 3JT (A106792) (S48509) ( 173 Or. App. 514) Minter, James Irwin v. Baldwin (A104898) (S48366) ( 172 Or. App. 763) Moore, Randy Joseph v. Palmateer (A110886) (S48575) ( 174 Or. App. 321) State ex rel Oregon Waste Systems v. United Pacific Insurance Company and Department of Transportation (A104354) (S48479) ( 172 Or. App. 435) State v. Marsing, Joshua Shane (A106125) (S48500) ( 174 Or. App. 319) State v. McEwen, Robert John (A107960) (S48547) ( 174 Or. App. 320) State v. Muyingo, Ahmed (A94292) (S48461) ( 171 Or. App. 218) State v. Van Cleave, Jeffery Loren (A106902) (S48542) ( 173 Or. App. 446) State v. Weaver, Timothy Michael (A107729) (S48587) ( 174 Or. App. 405)


Summaries of

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Aug 14, 2001
332 Or. 430 (Or. 2001)

concluding that, although incarceration alone is not sufficient, "a recurring pattern of criminal conduct and incarceration," in combination with other factors weighing against fitness, can justify termination of parental rights

Summary of this case from State ex rel Dept. of Human Services v. R. J. T

explaining that the focus is on "whether both parties consented to the entry of judgment"

Summary of this case from Varde v. Run! Day Camp for Dogs, LLC

stating that a trial court's directive regarding credit for time served would have "no force and effect, even if it remained in the judgment"

Summary of this case from State v. Phaneuf

relying on the absence of the father from his children's lives and the resultant lack of a parent-child bond in concluding that father was unfit

Summary of this case from State ex rel Dept. of Human Services v. Rardin

suggesting that Henderson is irreconcilable with later case law and should be overruled

Summary of this case from State v. Stubbs

deleting nunc pro tunc portion of judgment

Summary of this case from Evans v. Brentmar
Case details for

Petitions for Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Aug 14, 2001

Citations

332 Or. 430 (Or. 2001)

Citing Cases

State v. Williams

Because the state could not proceed to trial without the excluded evidence, the trial court dismissed the…

In re T. G. R

In that regard, our observations in Bisaccio v. Hart, 213 Or App 75, 79, 159 P3d 1179 (2007), are instructive…